Saturday Dad Reads Week of June 28

Freaky thinking, M&M's for Van Halen and Sweaty Summers of 2026

Welcome to this week’s edition! Here’s what we’ve got lined up:

  • 📕 This week’s Book Summary and Review: Think Like a Freak

  • 🧑‍🦰 Author Bio: Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner

  • 💣️ Dad’s Knowledge Bomb: Van Halen and Brown M&M’s

  • 🎮️ This week’s Dad Rant: Sum

 Summary

Leaders in any field are bombarded daily with complex scenarios that require them to think of novel solutions. However, coming up with novel solutions can require a mindset shift, a different way of thinking. In Think Like a Freak, Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, approach problem solving through the lens of how people respond to incentives and offer a way for leaders to reframe their approach to problem-solving. Levitt and Dubner use stories to highlight 8 keys to thinking like a “freak” with each story carrying a level of “stickiness” designed to stay with the reader and be easily applied to a leader’s daily routine. By the time the end of the book rolls around, readers and leaders will learn: the importance of saying '“I don’t know,” how to not just attack the “noisy part of the problem,” how to conduct a root cause analysis, the significance of being able to think with the sensibilities of an 8 year old, recognize what incentives really matter to people, teach their “garden to weed itself,” notice when people don’t want to be persuaded, and how to quit and walk away (read the book and this one will make more sense). In the end, readers and leaders are left with a fresh perspective through which to view and tackle their everyday conundrums.

📕 Review 

For as busy and hectic as the school year can be, in late June the pendulum always swings in the opposite direction and I find that my days are not consistently booked up with meeting after meeting and an endless task list. Instead of clock watching and as a means of continuing to grow as a school leader, I’ve built time into my schedule each day to do some reading and set a goal of reading 2-3 books on leadership before teachers and students return in August.

Think Like a Freak was the first leadership book in my summer “series” and it did not disappoint. Too often, I’ve found that books on leadership wax philosophical and I end up questioning the credibility of the author. Sure, you’re a leadership guru and have made a ton of money peddling your ideas, visuals and matrices, but what of consequence have you actually done?

I didn’t have the above experience with Think Like a Freak. Levitt and Dubner, who also published the wildly popular Freakonomics books, don’t pontificate or claim that the mindset they’re describing is the only thing that matters in leadership. Their approach is more “Here’s how we think differently about the problems people bring to us - you might find it useful in whatever field you’re in.” The overall tone is very inviting and encourages questioning and discussion as opposed to the authoritarian, “Do this or else you will fail as a leader.”

Also, leadership books only really work for me if there are 1-2 things that I can take and immediately implement in my daily practice. Again, Levitt and Dubner deliver in this fashion. One of the keys to thinking like a “freak” is being able to say “I don’t know.” It’s easy for us to make up an answer that proves to be wrong but, it is difficult for leaders to say “I don’t know.” We think that saying “I don’t know” damages our credibility, when rather it’s the reverse. Saying “I don’t know” and then finding the required answer to someone’s question and following up does wonders to build a leader’s credibility. After reading this, I've now made it my common practice to say: “I don’t know, but I’ll get you the answer.” It’s already paid dividends in the short time I’ve been doing it.

Lastly, the book worked for me because Levitt and Dubner are engaging storytellers. Each of the 8 key points to thinking like a “freak” are illustrated by at least 1 story that is written in such a fashion that it sticks with you long after the last page. From Kobayashi and the Nathan’s Hot Dog eating competition highlighting the key of “reframing the problem” to Van Halen’s dislike of brown M&Ms, highlighting the key of “getting your garden to weed itself,” the stories are eminently readable and make you feel like you’re being entertained as opposed to engaging in some serious self-work.

If you’re looking to grow as a leader this summer, give this one a shot first. It’s a quick read, but packed with worthwhile information.
Rating: ☕️☕️☕️☕️

🧑‍🦰 Author Spotlight: Steven Dubner and Stephen Levitt

Steven J. Levitt is an economics professor at the University of Chicago. His counterpart, Stephen J. Dubner is a journalist working in New York. Together, they are the minds that produced publishing phenoms Freakonomics and Superfreakonomics. If you haven’t read one or both, these 2 books aim to outline approaches solving problems through data and statistics. However, the books are written in a highly-engaging, anecdotal style that broadened the appeal of data analysis to the average layperson, causing the emergence of the pop-statistics and pop-economics genres.

Although their work has been challenged in terms of its validity and reliability, the fact that the Freaknomics books are on their 6th edition, speaks volumes to their approach and readability.

Check out freakonomics.com for more with Levitt and Dubner who have expanded their offerings to more than just books and now have a range of podcasts and the all-important merch shop!

💣️ Dad’s Knowledge Bomb: Van Halen and Brown M&Ms

As I mentioned in the review, Levitt and Dubner are great storytellers and do a wonderful job highlighting their key points with engaging and “off the beaten path” anecdotes. The stories truly stick with you, which is why I wanted to paraphrase one of my favorite in this week’s “Knowledge Bomb” because it’s not only a great story, but a factoid a dad needs to be able to deploy.

One of the keys to “thinking like a freak” is to devise ways to have your “garden weed itself.” I interpret this not as micromanagement but creating systems and structures in your team by which, along with extending trust, ensure that those you lead are doing their due diligence. Let’s face it, there are those who will do everything we ask of them regardless because that’s just who they are, but there are also others for whom the incentive to slack, cut corners, and be off mission is easier to obtain and more enticing than putting in work.

The story I’m about to paraphrase deals exactly with such a system.

When the band Van Halen was on tour, they put on a hell of a show. Their stage set ups were epic and their sound and lighting pulled immense amounts of electricity, placing immense strain on stadium and arena infrastructure. To make sure that the show went on without someone getting hurt in a stage collapse or having to cut a show short due to a power outage, the band and its management team put together an immense compendium that was exacting in its message to event staff and promoters. Follow these instructions to a “T” and be prepared to be blown away.

Now, because the document was so precise and large, the band need to ensure that event staff had done their part to thoroughly review it. So they slid a slight, “diva-ish” note into the text. According to the note, in the band’s dressing room, there was to be a large bowl of M&Ms for the band to snack on. However, all the brown M&Ms needed to be removed. Not one should remain in the bowl.

Upon arrival at the venue, the band would inspect the bowl to ensure there were no brown M&Ms. If there were no brown M&Ms in the bowl, they could be reasonably confident that the event staff were familiar with their show specifications and they could be assured of a smooth performance. If there were brown M&Ms present, that was a signal to the band that the staff did not do their due diligence and they could not be confident that their specifications were met and that the show would proceed smoothly. As a show of their displeasure, the band would destroy the dressing room post-show.

As leaders we have to trust our team to get the job done, but we also must input checks and balances to periodically monitor what is being done. Sometimes that requires us re-thinking our approach and finding a rather unconventional way to do so.

Dad Rant: Back to 2006

This week, I don’t really have a rant, but more of a reminiscence.

Western Pennsylvania has basically been the surface of the sun this past week, but despite the temps, I took time after work each day to walk in the local cemetery. It’s a great walk - quiet, and the layout of hills and paths actually makes for a decent workout, especially in the heat.

It was early in the week when I had this hit of nostalgia. As I walked, sweat pouring off of me, I kept thinking 1.) I forgot how good a getting in a solid sweat feels and 2.) I feel like it’s the summer of 2006 again.

It’s amazing how a sensory experience like dripping sweat and walking in oppressive heat can transport you to another place and time. In this case, I was 19 again, the summer just as hot, I was training for the upcoming college soccer season, working, and in the best shape of my life.

As I walked, not only was I 19 again, but I was loading trucks and filling customer orders from 7am-5pm, Monday-Friday in a warehouse with no A/C. I was getting my first real taste of being dependent on coffee and checking my brick-sized Nokia cell phone for messages from girls I was chasing and messages from friends with the night’s plans. I was running sprints and conditioning drills in my parents' yard, and playing in the Friday night men’s open league down at the SportsZone. I was coming home late and getting up early just to do it all over again the next day. What a time to be alive.

As I got in my car to head home, it hit me. I am just as far removed from that point in time now in June of 2025 as I was in June of 2006 from my own day of birth. And that one, my friends, stings just a little bit for a retired Division III athlete.

Saturday Dad’s Rating System

I’m not a published author. Therefore, I’m never going to shit all over something that someone poured themselves into. That being said, each book review will be rated on a scale of 3-5 coffees. Here’s what that means:

☕️ ☕️ ☕️ - You’re going to want to get comfortable and fill that cup up 3 times. This one’s solid!

☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ - You’re going to want to give yourself a few hours of alone time. Fill that bad boy up 4 times and buckle up.

☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ ☕️ - Send the kids to grandma’s house and call off work. You’re not going to be able to put this one down. Make a whole pot and settle in for the long haul!